Spec 5 — Direction A table harmony

Placement is settled: one table on /template-groups/[id], the separate emerald Spec 5 section deleted. These three options differ only in how much picker info we surface and how visual it is. All three render against a faithful copy of the real template list (its actual columns, badges, and ghost Actions buttons) and use only the existing stack — no new look, no new deps.

What shipped (and is being replaced): the original Direction-A mockup → live built a second emerald-tinted table below the existing one, with its own color palette, a Sheet drawer, and a separate "Exclude from rotation" button. That second table is what you flagged as not matching the system. Everything below folds the picker data into the table that's already there.

Shared by all three

Pin lives in the existing Actions column as a 📌 ghost button → opens a Popover with a % slider (not a modal). Click a pinned row's button again to Unpin.
The Spec 5 "Exclude from rotation" UI is removed — admins use the existing Active = No toggle (the picker already filters is_active = true), so there's one verb, not two.
Badge row gains one outline badge: Picker · 90d SALES · 4 scored · 1 unscored — the live scoring window made explicit.
Default sort flips to Share ▼ (dominant template first), matching Spec 1 / Spec 4.

1. Minimal harmony — one new column: Share

Add a single Share column = next-blast allocation %. Plain tabular-nums text, 📌 + floor when pinned. No raw score. The table looks like today's with exactly one extra column and one extra Actions button.

RECOMMENDED — max harmony, lowest risk

6 templates5 activeAvg 138 chars SALES Picker · 90d SALES · 4 scored · 1 unscored

ID	Body	Len	Source	Used	Spam	Share ▼	Active	Actions
#3201	Hey {first_name}, quick question about your Medicare options…	122	AI	1,240	2.1	31.2% 📌	Yes	Edit📌⛨🗑
#3245	Brice, we're a growing agency in IN looking to…	147	AI	980	1.8	24.8%	Yes	Edit📌⛨🗑
#3310	Following up — still interested in a quick chat?	96	Manual	410	1.2	18.1%	Yes	Edit📌⛨🗑
#3402	Hi {first_name}! New offer this month only…	131	AI	12	2.4	8.0% explore	Yes	Edit📌⛨🗑
#3150	Last chance to claim your spot before we close…	158	AI	2,100	3.6	4.2%	Yes	Edit📌⛨🗑
#3088	Spring seasonal promo (retired)	88	Manual	560	1.0	—	No	Edit📌⛨🗑

Pin floor — #3201

30%

UnpinSave

Pros

Closest to today's table — zero re-learning
Hardest to mis-read; no chart vocabulary
Smallest build, lowest regression risk

Cons

No window into why a template gets its share
Relative allocation harder to eyeball than a bar

2. Share + Score — two new columns

Option 1 plus a Score column — the raw weighted number behind the share, colored with the shared template-color-classes vocabulary (same green/red as Spec 1 / Spec 4). Answers "why is this favored?" for power users.

6 templates5 activeSALES Picker · 90d SALES · 4 scored · 1 unscored

ID	Body	Used	Score	Share ▼	Active	Actions
#3201	Hey {first_name}, quick question about your Medicare…	1,240	0.052	31.2% 📌	Yes	Edit📌⛨🗑
#3245	Brice, we're a growing agency in IN looking to…	980	0.041	24.8%	Yes	Edit📌⛨🗑
#3310	Following up — still interested in a quick chat?	410	0.029	18.1%	Yes	Edit📌⛨🗑
#3402	Hi {first_name}! New offer this month only…	12	—	8.0% explore	Yes	Edit📌⛨🗑
#3150	Last chance to claim your spot before we close…	2,100	-0.018	4.2%	Yes	Edit📌⛨🗑

Pros

Transparency — admin sees the signal, not just the outcome
Reuses shared color helpers → consistent with sibling pages

Cons

Raw score is abstract; most admins act on Share
One more column on an already-wide CRUD table

3. Share as an inline bar — one column, more visual

One Share column, drawn as a thin neutral allocation bar + % label so relative weight is scannable at a glance; a small caret marks the pin floor. Deliberately monochrome slate — not the emerald that drew the complaint.

6 templates5 activeSALES Picker · 90d SALES · 4 scored · 1 unscored

ID	Body	Used	Share ▼	Active	Actions
#3201	Hey {first_name}, quick question about your Medicare…	1,240	31.2% 📌	Yes	Edit📌⛨🗑
#3245	Brice, we're a growing agency in IN looking to…	980	24.8%	Yes	Edit📌⛨🗑
#3310	Following up — still interested in a quick chat?	410	18.1%	Yes	Edit📌⛨🗑
#3402	Hi {first_name}! New offer this month only…	12	8.0% explore	Yes	Edit📌⛨🗑
#3150	Last chance to claim your spot before we close…	2,100	4.2%	Yes	Edit📌⛨🗑

Pros

Relative allocation readable in one glance
Pin floor visible as a marker on the bar
Best "feel" of the three (subtle motion on refresh)

Cons

Bars are closest to the decoration that drew the complaint — must stay strictly monochrome
Slightly more build + a tiny bar component to test

Reply in terminal which direction (1 / 2 / 3). Mixing is fine — e.g. ship 1 now, add option 2's Score later behind a toggle.

Spec 5 — Direction A, harmonized with the real table

Pros

Cons

Pros

Cons

Pros

Cons